雅思阅读核心词汇表以及记忆方法建议雅思阅读核心词汇表以及记忆方法建议一文汇总了雅思阅读中的常用词汇供大家参考，并且告诉了我们怎样去记忆这些单词,下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。

雅思阅读核心词汇表以及记忆方法建议雅思阅读核心词汇表以及记忆方法建议为你带来雅思阅读中常常出现的词汇列表以及在以及雅思阅读词汇时的方法和建议。

雅思阅读一共有3篇文章，内容从自然科学到人文科学，题目数量为40多道，题目类型有14，15种。

这样一个科目需要记住哪些核心的单词呢。

我们一起来看一下。

Academician 院士A-list 名流群，精英all-expense tour 自费游Alma Mater 母校Antichoice 反堕胎Backwater 死水，死气沉沉的地方Badger game 美人计Bagstuffer 街头广告传单Bandwagon 见风使舵Bank of issue 发行银行Bard-of-Avon 埃文河诗人，莎士比亚的别称Bearish 行情下跌的Beat generation 垮掉的一代Beau monde 上流社会Beautiful people 上流社会的时髦阶层Bee (美)为互助友好而举行的聚会Beeper BP机Bell-bottom trousers 喇叭裤Benefit 义卖，义演，义赛Bermuda Triangle 百慕大三角洲Big stick大棒政策Bigtime 红极一时的，赫赫有名的Black referee 黑哨Blue moon 千载难逢的时机Box news 花边新闻Box office 票房Brain drain 脑力人才外流Brain trust 政府的智囊团Brainwave 灵感，突然想到的主意Brawn drain 劳力外流Break- dancing 霹雳舞Bridesmaid 女傧相Bullish 行情上涨的CDV compact video disc 激光光碟Connoisseur 鉴赏家Cottonmouth snake 百步蛇disposable worker 临时工Divorcee 离了婚的人Doctorate博士学位Dog days 七八月份的酷暑期，伏天告别死记硬背,提高单词背诵效率的方法一、制定计划，反复循环，坚持学习。

背单词是一个非常繁重的任务，它需要大量的精力。

如果不制定一个周密的计划，很多考生将很难坚持。

所以这一步是非常有必要的。

一般来说，考前一定将单词手册背诵3遍，第一遍仔细学习，第二遍进行巩固，第三遍查漏补缺加深印象。

这样所起到的效果要比只背一遍好得多。

二、背诵单词应与实践同步。

英语单词归根到底还是要放在语言中进行使用的，如果只背单词却不把单词放到语境中去理解，那么记单词的效率就会大打折扣。

因此考生在背诵单词的时候一定要同时辅以大量的听说读写练习，在反复的使用中巩固单词的读音、意义和用法。

线话英语采用电话英语教学模式，让你足不出户就能与海外外教老师一对一进行英语口语对话。

高密度的英语口语交流让你在听和说的过程中不断学习新单词，巩固所背单词，在实践中将书面词汇化为己有，从而达到真正掌握单词运用的目的。

三、听说读写齐头并进记单词。

很多考生记单词的时候只是看，造成的结果往往是只记得外形，在阅读里面能够认识，但是在听力里面根本听不出来，写作里面也拼不出来，英语口语里面更不可能说出来。

这样的词汇量对于英语学习来说，只是“消极词汇”。

而最佳的背诵单词的方法应该是先把单词看一遍，同时听一下标准的录音，然后嘴里再不停地跟读，最后把这个单词凭着自己的发音记录下来。

只有像这样多感觉“齐头并进”，才能将单词记忆得最深刻。

以上就是雅思阅读核心词汇表以及记忆方法建议的全部内容，同学们在记忆单词的时候，可以试着用文中告诉我们的方法进行记忆。

争取让记单词变得更加有趣。

雅思阅读虽然在雅思的4个科目里面，被认为是中国学生较擅长的科目，但是我们仍然不能掉以轻心。

雅思考试阅读模拟试题及答案1 There’s a dimmer switch inside the sun that causes its brightness to riseand fall on timescales of around 100，000 years - exactly the same period asbetween ice ages on Earth. So says a physicist who has created a computer modelof our star’s core.2 Robert Ehrlich of George Mason University in Fairfax，Virginia，modelledthe effect of temperature fluctuations in the sun’s interior. According to thestandard view，the temperature of the sun’s core is held constant by the opposing pressures of gravity and nuclear fusion. However，Ehrlich believed thatslight variations should be possible.3 He took as his starting point the work of Attila Grandpierre of the KonkolyObservatory of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. In 2005，Grandpierre and acollaborator，Gábor ágoston，calculated that magnetic fields in the sun’s corecould produce small instabilities in the solar plasma. These instabilities wouldinduce localised oscillations in temperature.4 Ehrlich’s model shows that whilst most of these oscillations cancel eachother out，some reinforce one another and become long-lived temperaturevariations. The favoured frequencies allow the sun’s core temperature to oscillate around its average temperature of 13.6 million kelvin in cycles lasting either 100，000 or 41，000 years. Ehrlich says that randominteractionswithin the sun’s magnetic field could flip the fluctuations from one cycle length to the other.5 These two timescales are instantly recognisable to anyone familiar withEarth’s ice ages：for the past million years，ice ages have occurred roughlyevery 100，000 years. Before that，they occurred roughly every 41，000 years.6 Most scientists believe that the ice ages are the result of subtle changesin Earth’s orbit，known as the Milankovitch cycles. One such cycle describes theway Earth’s orbit gradually changes shape from a circle to a slight ellipse andback again roughly every 100，000 years. The theory says this alters the amountof solar radiation that Earth receives，triggering the ice ages. However，apersistent problem with this theory has been its inability to explain why theice ages changed frequency a million years ago.7 In Milankovitch，there is certainly no good idea why the frequency shouldchange from one to another，says Neil Edwards，a climatologist at the OpenUniversity in Milton Keynes，UK. Nor is the transition problem the only one theMilankovitch theory faces. Ehrlich and other critics claim that the temperaturevariations caused by Milankovitch cycles are simply not big enough to drive iceages.8 However，Edwards believes the small changes in solar heating produced byMilankovitch cycles are then amplified by feedback mechanisms on Earth. Forexample，if sea ice begins to form because of a slight cooling，carbon dioxidethat would otherwise have found its way into the atmosphere as part of thecarbon cycle is locked into the ice. That weakens the greenhouse effect andEarth grows even colder.9 According to Edwards，there is no lack of such mechanisms. If you addtheir effects together，there is more than enough feedback to make Milankovitchwork，he says. The problem now is identifying which mechanisms are at work.This is why scientists like Edwards are not yet ready to give up on the currenttheory. Milankovitch cycles give us ice ages roughly when we observe them tohappen. We can calculate where we are in the cycle and compare it with observation，he says. I can’t see any way of testing [Ehrlich’s] idea to seewhere we are in the temperature oscillation.10 Ehrlich concedes this. If there is a way to test this theory on the sun，I can’t think of one that is practical，he says. That’s because variation over41，000 to 100，000 years is too gradual to be observed. However，there may be away to test it in other stars：red dwarfs. Their cores are much smaller thanthat of the sun，and so Ehrlich believes that the oscillation periods could beshort enough to be observed. He has yet to calculate the precise period or theextent of variation in brightness to be expected.11 Nigel Weiss，a solar physicist at the University of Cambridge，is far fromconvinced. He describes Ehrlich’s claims as utterly implausible. Ehrlich counters that Weiss’s opinion is based on the standard solar model，which failsto take into account the magnetic instabilities that cause the temperature fluctuations.Questions 1-4Complete each of the following statements with One or Two names of thescientists from the box below.Write the appropriate letters A-E in boxes 1-4 on your answer sheet.A. Attila GrandpierreB. Gábor ágostonC. Neil EdwardsD. Nigel WeissE. Robert Ehrlich1. ...claims there a dimmer switch inside the sun that causes its brightnessto rise and fall in periods as long as those between ice ages on Earth.2. ...calculated that the internal solar magnetic fields could produce instabilities in the solar plasma.3. ...holds that Milankovitch cycles can induce changes in solar heating onEarth and the changes are amplified on Earth.4. ...doesn’t believe in Ehrlich’s viewpoints at all.Questions 5-9Do the following statements agree with the information given in the readingpassage?In boxes 5-9 on your answer sheet writeTRUE if the statement is true according to the passageFALSE if the statement is false according to the passageNOT GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage5. The ice ages changed frequency from 100，000 to 41，000 years a millionyears ago.6. The sole problem that the Milankovitch theory can not solve is to explainwhy the ice age frequency should shift from one to another.7. Carbon dioxide can be locked artificially into sea ice to eliminate thegreenhouse effect.8. Some scientists are not ready to give up the Milankovitch theory thoughthey haven’t figured out which mechanisms amplify the changes in solar heating.9. Both Edwards and Ehrlich believe that there is no practical way to testwhen the solar temperature oscillation begins and when ends.Questions 10-14Complete the notes below.Choose one suitable word from the Reading Passage above for each answer.Write your answers in boxes 10-14 on your answer sheet.The standard view assumes that the opposing pressures of gravity and nuclearfusions hold the temperature ...10...in the sun’s interior，but the slight changes in the earth’s ...11... alter the temperature on the earth and cause iceages every 100，000 years. A British scientist，however，challenges thisview byclaiming that the internal solar magnetic ...12... can induce the temperatureoscillations in the sun’s interior. The sun’s core temperature oscillates aroundits average temperature in ...13... lasting either 100，000 or 41，000 years. Andthe ...14... interactions within the sun’s magnetic field could flip the fluctuations from one cycle length to the other，which explains why the ice ageschanged frequency a million years ago.雅思考试阅读模拟试题及答案Answer keys and explanations：1. ESee the sentences in paragraph 1(There’s a dimmer switch inside the sun thatcauses its brightness to rise and fall on timescales of around 100，000 years -exactly the same period as between ice ages on Earth. So says a physicist whohas created a computer model of our star’s core.) and para.2 (Robert Ehrlich ofGeorge Mason University in Fairfax，Virginia，modelled the effect of temperaturefluctuations in the sun’s interior.)2. A BSee para.3：?i style=’normal’Grandpierre and a collaborator，Gáborágoston，calculated that magnetic fields in the sun’s core could produce smallinstabilities in the solar plasma.3. CSee para.8：Edwards believes the small changes in solar heating produced byMilankovitch cycles are then amplified by feedback mechanisms on Earth.4. DSee para.11：Nigel Weiss，a solar physicist at the University of Cambridge，is far from convinced. He describes Ehrlich’s claims as utterly implausible.5. FalseSee para.5：for the past million years，ice ages have occurred roughly every100，000 years. Before that，they occurred roughly every 41，000 years.6. FalseSee para.7：In Milankovitch，there is certainly no good idea why thefrequency should change from one to another，... Nor is the transition problemthe only one the Milankovitch theory faces.7. Not GivenSee para.8：if sea ice begins to form because of a slight cooling，carbondioxide?is locked into the ice. That weakens the greenhouse effect. (The passagedoesn抰mention anything about locking Co2 into ice artificially.)8. TrueSee para.9：there is no lack of such mechanisms. If you add their effectstogether，there is more than enough feedback to make Milankovitch work，?Theproblem now is identifying which mechanisms are at work. This is why scientistslike Edwards are not yet ready to give up on the current theory.9. TrueSee the sentences in para.9 (According to Edwards，卙e says. I can’t see anyway of testing [Ehrlich’s] idea to see where we are in the temperature oscillation.) and para.10 (Ehrlich concedes this. If there is a way to test this theory on the sun，I can’t think of one that is practical).10. constantSee para.2：According to the standard view，the temperature of the sun’s coreis held constant by the opposing pressures of gravity and nuclear fusion.11. orbitSee para.6：Most scientists believe that the ice ages are the result of subtle changes in Earth’s orbit，匛arth’s orbit gradually changes shape from acircle to a slight ellipse and back again roughly every 100，000 years.12. instabilitiesSee para.3：?i style=’magnetic fields in the sun’s core could produce smallinstabilities in the solar plasma. These instabilities would induce localised oscillations in temperature.13. cyclesSee para.4：…allow the sun’s core temperature to oscillate around its averagetemperature of 13.6 million kelvin in cycles lasting either 100，000 or 41，000years.14. randomSee para.4：Ehrlich says that random interactions within the sun’s magneticfield could flip the fluctuations from one cycle length to the other 雅思阅读核心词汇表以及记忆方法建议。