Copyright Autoliv Inc., All Rights Reserved
Step 2 Describe the Problem
Picture of Non Conforming Condition Picture of Conforming Condition
Condition Is:
ACN-C-F010-EN-1.0
Copyright Autoliv Inc., All Rights Reserved
Step 3 Implement Containment Actions
Copy of Inspection Sorting and/or Containment instructions to workers responsible
ACN-C-F010-EN-1.0 Copyright Autoliv Inc., AllTeam
(Members should include all pertinent groups - Cross-Functional)

Roles
Why
Why
Detection Cause
Occurrence Root Cause
Why
Why
Why
Why
Detection Root Cause
ACN-C-F010-EN-1.0
Copyright Autoliv Inc., All Rights Reserved
Step 4 Root Cause Analysis – Fault Tree Analysis
ACN-C-F010-EN-1.0
Copyright Autoliv Inc., All Rights Reserved
Step 4 Root Cause Analysis –Five Why – Occurrence and Detection
Occurrence Cause
Why
Why
Problem Statement
Desired Condition:
Actual Condition:


How many parts have the problem?
What is the size of the problem? How many times does the problem occur on each part?
Autoliv Requirement is:

What part has the problem? Where was the part when the problem was observed? Where is the problem on the part? When was the problem observed first (clock and calendar time)? When since that time has the problem been observed? Any pattern? When, in the part’s history or life cycle, was the problem first observed?
Autoliv NCM number issued for this problem: Bookend Dates: From:
Problem start date
To:
Clean point by inspection (or otherwise) Date
What is the suspect AIAG label serial number/lots? What are the inventory locations (warehouse, in-transit)? What is the total N/G product produced? List all affected Part Numbers: How many are produced each shift? How many shifts run this product? Supplier Autoliv Customer
Copyright Autoliv Inc., All Rights Reserved
Step 4 Root Cause Analysis – Verification of Root Cause
Root Cause
(From previous pages)
Data that Supports/Proves the Root Cause
Please place your Plant/Location here
Please place a simple phrase that describes your problem here
Name of 8D Owner 8D Number in APSD Date 8D Issued: Place date here
Evaluated for risk using FMEA or other risk analysis tools to prevent secondary problem that could result from the containment action.
Evaluated?
Yes No
Note to user: This form is meant to be a template to better enable you to meet the AS63 standard, which is quite indepth and profound. Due to the uniqueness of each problem, you may need to modify/add to this presentation so that you comply with the actual AS63 standard.
Optional
Measurement Accept Reject Explanation Delete this overhead if not used.
Machine
Accept
Reject
Explanation
Material
Accept
Reject
Explanation
ACN-C-F010-EN-1.0
Occurrence Cause
Detection Cause
ACN-C-F010-EN-1.0
Copyright Autoliv Inc., All Rights Reserved
Step 6 Evaluate Results
Confirm the problem is eliminated!
Total Quantity Inspected Post the Permanent Corrective Action Quantity Rejected Quantity Accepted
The following two overheads, the Fishbone and the Cause and Effect Table, are optional problem solving tools and should be used if the other tools were inadequate.
Inspection Method Used Post the Permanent Corrective Action
Gage R&R/Kappa score for this inspection exercise in step 6.
Poka-Yoke?
Yes
(Please include justification.)
ACN-C-F010-EN-1.0
Copyright Autoliv Inc., All Rights Reserved
Step 4 Root Cause Analysis (Fishbone)
Man Method
Measurement
Effect
Optional Delete this overhead if not used.
Add your own fault tree here or delete overhead if you use 5 Why.
ACN-C-F010-EN-1.0
Copyright Autoliv Inc., All Rights Reserved
Step 4 Root Cause Analysis
Note: Insert the appropriate pictures or sketches in the boxes provided above
ACN-C-F010-EN-1.0 Copyright Autoliv Inc., All Rights Reserved
Step 3 Implement Containment Actions
Machine
Material
Note: Circle the accepted causes in red.
To input data in the boxes just highlight the box (you will see cross hatch lines on the boarder) and start typing your text. The text should automatically wrap inside the box.
Inspection Method Used
Kappa Score or Gage R&R (or what is
the validation method sort process)