托福写作高分满分范文为了让大家更好的准备托福考试，给大家了托福考试满分范文,下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。
Should higher education be available to all students or only to good students?Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students. Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students. Discuss these views. Which view do you agree with? Explain why.写作思路展开结构分析两个观点都有些极端。
所以，大家应该先分析，再选择自己的立场。
义务教育制度(institution of pulsory education )说明社会已经认识到基础教育(fundamental education) 对所有的人都是必需的。
但是大学教育是不是所有人都需要的?这个社会很多职业(比如，饮食业)不需要大学教育。
让所有的人都上大学，是不是成为过分的财政负担(financial burden of the government)?用什么样的方法确定一个学生good enough so as to deserve highereducation? 考试?考试制度也有缺陷。
可能选择的立场比如：我们国家目前是需要更多的人接受大学教育。
与此同时，一方面要保障大学教育的质量，另一方面，要改革考试制度，保障考生的公平机会。
本话题高分范文赏析Some people believe that only good students should have aess to a university education. Others posit that higher education should be open to everyone, regardless of their academic abilities. I agree with the former opinion. Universities should only allow good students into their programs because these students value the importance of a good education and are interested in furthering their education. Furthermore, if all students were allowed into universities, the schools would quickly bee saturated, and the quality of education received would diminish. A university education is very important to a good student. This type of student has set his/her sights on a university education from early on, and has put in the necessary work to earn a place in a good university. Poor students who did not try to achieve good grades in high school obviously donot care about their education, and therefore, do not deserve to go to university. However, if these poor students go back to school and improve their grades, they should also be allowed to go to university. Good students are very interested in furthering their education. They have put copious amounts of work into their education, and are interested in learning more. Poor students are usually not as interested in furthering their education. If they were interested in this, they would have tried harder to begin with. With that said, let us suppose for a momentthat universities did allow all students, regardless of their grades, into university. The school would quickly bee overfull, and good students, who really care about their education, would suffer because of it. They might not be able to get into the classes they want, and if they do get in, there might be so many students in the class that it is impossible to learn. In conclusion, I think that it is important to save a university education for those who really want it—good students. If a poor student wishes to go to university, then he/she will have to return to high school and improve his/her grades.托福写作难点话题一览Should young children spend most of their time on school studies or playing?Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age and should spend most oftheir time on school studies. Others believe that young children should spend most of their time playing. Compare these two views. Which view do you agree with? Why?两种观点都有些极端。
先比较两种观点，然后选择一个折衷的立场。
早上学的好处和坏处：好处是很多提前上学的孩子显得聪明，对付学习显得游刃有余(be more than equal to a task; aomplish a task with ease)。
完成formal education的时候比别人年轻，有更多的选择余地。
坏处是，经常挨欺负(be bullied; be treated rough)。
早熟(precocious)，可能会有副作用(negative effects)。
晚上学的好处和坏处：实际上并不吃亏;学习好坏不见得一定跟上学早晚有必然的联系(positive connection)。
坏处是，家长如果引导不好，不利于智力发育(development of child's in___igence)。
立场：不见得一定要尽早上学;孩子确实应该多花一些时间去玩。
但是应该正确引导，因为玩也分为好多种，玩棋牌游戏显然比玩泥巴(play with mud)要有益得多。
本话题高分范文赏析Some people believe that it is important for children to begin their education at a very early age, and spend most of their time on academic studies. Others believe that children should spend their time playing instead of studying. To understand the logic behind these two views, we must pare their advantages and disadvantages. If a child spends all of his/her time studying, he/she will advance quickly in school. He/she will learn things early in life that other children, who spent their time playing, will not learn until they are at least a few years older. This child will learn the value of education early on, and will be able to impress his/her parents with his/her knowledge, therefore gaining self-confidence and motivation. If achild spends most of his time playing, he/she will not learn about mathematics and science, but he/she will learn another important skill: socialization. When children spend their time playing together, they learn how to interactwith others. They learn how to share things, and how to settle a disagreement amicably. Children can also increase their motor skills if they spend their time playing games that involve hand-eye coordination. Both of these perspectives have valid points. However, I think it is best to try and bine playing with learning. If children can learn about the basics of academics in a fun and playful environment, they are likely to bee more interested in it.A very young child has no interest in studying, and I believe that adults must allow children to have fun. Otherwise, the children will grow up to be uncaring, antisocial adults. This does not mean, however, that education is not important. I feel that there is a right time to introduce studying and academia to children, and this time is not when they are very young. It is better to wait until the children are at least five or six year old before trying to get them to study.Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age and should spend most oftheir time on school studies. Others believe that youngchildren should spend most of their time playing. Compare these two views. Which view do you agree with? Why?参考分析：两种观点都有些极端。