Difficult sentence:
美国最高院在潜在的夸大该问题的同时，提 出一相关论点：“集团不能构成犯罪”已不能适 用于现状，基于这一条款豁免集团的所有刑罚， 实际上将会使有效控制集团犯罪、纠正对该条款 滥用的唯一方法失效。
Thank you!
姓名：武慧 学院：法学院 学号：15121770
Байду номын сангаас
Structure:
Introduction I. Corporate criminal liability II. Corporate decision making III.Character evidence IV.Character evidence as applied to corporations Conclusion
Difficult sentence:
While potentially overstating the problem, the U.S. Supreme Court made a relevant point when it said that "to give corporations immunity from all punishment because of the old and exploded doctrine that a corporation cannot commit a crime would virtually take away the only means of effectually controlling the subject matter and correcting the abuses aimed at."
Main idea:
In the last few years, corporations have been accused of crimes ranging from environmental pollution on an unprecedented scale, to manslaughter, to largescale antitrust violations. Many of these accused companies had previously committed similar acts or even the exact same offense. Unfortunately, the rules of evidence in the federal system and in virtually every state system prohibit the use of this information in a prosecution for such crimes. This Article shows why evidence concerning the character of a corporation should be allowed in criminal.
Criminal corporate character
姓名：武慧 学院：法学院 学号：15121770
Author: Robert E. Wagner: Assistant Professor, Baruch College Zicklin School of Business Department of Law;M.B.A., University of Chicago Booth School of Business; J.D., Cornell Law School.