商业经济类（Passage 48～52）Passage 48 题材：商业经济类字数：427 建议用时：5分钟The world is going through the biggest wave of mergers and acquisitions ever witnessed. The process sweeps from hyperactive America to Europe and reaches the emerging countries with unsurpassed might. Many in these countries are looking at this process and worrying: “Won’t the wave of business concentration turn into an uncontrollable anti-competitive force?”There’s no question that the big are getting bigger and more powerful. Multinational corporations accounted for less than 20% of international trade in 1982. Today the figure is more than 25% and growing rapidly. International affiliates account for a fast-growing segment of production in economies that open up and welcome foreign investment. In Argentina, for instance, after the reforms of the early 1990s, multinationals went from 43% to almost 70% of the industrial production of the 200 largest firms. This phenomenon has created serious concerns over the role of smaller economic firms, of national businessmen and over the ultimate stability of the world economy.I believe that the most important forces behind the massive M&A wave are the same that underlie the globalization process: falling transportation and communication costs, lower trade and investment barriers and enlarged markets that require enlarged operations capable of meeting customers’ demands. All these are beneficial, not detrimental, to consumers. As productivity grows, theworld’s wealth increases.Examples of benefits or costs of the current concentration wave are scanty. Yet it is hard to imagine that the merger of a few oil firms today could re-create the same threats to competition that were feared nearly a century ago in the U.S., when the Standard Oil Trust was broken up. The mergers of telecom companies, such as WorldCom, hardly seem to bring higher prices for consumers or a reduction in the pace of technical progress. On the contrary, the price of communications is coming down fast. In cars, too, concentration is increasing—witness Daimler and Chrysler, Renault and Nissan—but it does not appear that consumers are being hurt.Yet the fact remains that the merger movement must be watched. A few weeks ago, Alan Greenspan warned against the megamergers in the banking industry. Who is going to supervise, regulate and operate as lender of last resort with the gigantic banks that are being created? Won’t multinationals shift production from one place to another when a nation gets too strict about infringements to fair competition? And should one country take upon itself the role of “defending competition” on issues that affect many other nations, a s in theU.S. vs. Microsoft case?1. What is mentioned about the wave of mergers and acquisitions?A. It is warmly welcome by the American and European countries.B. It turns to be an uncontrollable anti-competitive force.C. It sweeps the world with unprecedented force.D. It is a new trend in the business world that never appeared before.2. The author cited the multinationals in Argentina in order to ______.A. arouse concern over the stability of the world economyB. criticize the overemphasis on the development of multinationalsC. be a contrast to the insufficient concern about smaller national firmsD. illustrate the increasing importance of multinationals in international trades3. In the last paragraph, the author most probably agrees that ______.A. mega banki ng mergers will not appear because of Greenspan’s warningB. multinationals always try to avoid violating fair competitionC. the attitude towards unfair competition varies from nation to nationD. the U.S. shou ldn’t have sued Microsoft for unfa ir competition4. What will the forces behind the wave of mergers and acquisitions result in?5. What did the U.S. fear nearly a century ago?「文章大意」目前，世界上正在进行着前所未有的企业合并重组，有人担心这种合并会不会成为反竞争的力量。

无疑，大企业变得越来越强大，如跨国公司在国际贸易中的比例快速上升。

企业并购背后的原因却是一样的：全球化的发展，而这并购会给人们带来好处。

但是需要注意的是，并购必须有监管，否则后果很严重。

答案详解1.C 根据题干关键词mergers and acquisitions可将本题答案定位到第一段。

该段第二句提到“The process sweeps from hyperactive America to Europe and reaches the emerging countries with unsurpassed might”，C项中的unprecedented force与这句话的内容相近，所以本题应选C。

2.D 根据题干关键词multinationals in Argentina可将本题答案定位到第二段第5句“InArgentina, for instance, after the reforms of the early 1990s, multinationals went from 43% to almost 70% of the industrial production of the 200 largest firms”，在该句中提到的Argentina的情况是为了说明该段前几句的观点即跨国公司生意越做越大，地位越来越重要，D与原文意思最相近，所以本题应选D。