2019 年10 月19 日雅思写作专业预测作者：上海环球教育更多写作真题范文、预测范文可以扫二维码10 月 19 日写作预测一Taking care of children is important, so both mothers and fathers should take childcare training courses. Do you agree or disagree?（2013/01/19）范文：Both positive and negative effects of childcare have proven to be long lasting.Therefore，there has been a surge of interest in arranging childcare courses for parents. Although it seems to be overreaching to require both parents’ participation in professionally organized childcare training, personally, I believe that both parents’　participation is advisable for the sake of providing growth-oriented environment for children.The notion that the role of parents is to provide a safe place for children to relax,cater for child’ｓemotional and physical needs, and provide consistent and responsive care is narrow and superficial. Instead，a lot more are expected from the role ofparents and the parenting children received. First of all, taking training course allows parents have a clear perspective of what to expect from the childdevelopmentally and are able to nurture his growing skills accordingly.Simultaneously, researches prove that childr en’s foundational understanding of intelligence and emotion is formed before they even start explicitly learning acurriculum. It is the environment created by the parents that could stunt orfacilitate a child’s sensory, motor, emotional, and linguistic development. This is not only because children are prone to model everything a parent does and incorporate what they see into their own lives. Also, the home education system adopted by the parents and the level of support given to their children will directly affect theirchildren’ｓintelligence development and problem-solving ability. Therefore, it is crucial for parents to take advice and training on how to behave themselves in frontof their children and how to guarantee formal, structured environment for childrento stretch and grow.In conclusion, parents have much o f a role to play in the growth of the next generation in more aspects than is generally believed. Those traditional ways of childcare isno longer sufficient.10 月 19 日写作预测二Nowadays m ore and more jobs and tasks are done by machines which involve hard physical work. Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects? (2015/11/19)范文The advanced technologies are massively used in many aspects nowadays, and theycan complete many things that used to be done by human labour. From my perspective,though it has some potential shortcomings, this development can be regarded aspositive.On t he one hand, the benefits of robots are undeniable. Firstly, robots can perform some r isky task for human beings such as mining and exploration in extreme conditions.In this way, people’ｓ security can be greatly enhanced if these perilous tasks are undertaken by them. Secondly, robots can work more efficiently and accurately thantheir human c ounterparts. The workload which could take days to finish by manual work could be done by robot faultlessly within several minutes. For example, when a ssembling the micro electronic devices, robots undoubtably accomplish this task much b etter than human. Since being substituted, human b eings have more time and energy to fulfill other tasks or enjoy longer leisure time.On t he other hand, the downsides of too much r eliance on robots cannot be ignored. The most obvious one is the decline of employment rate. Since the incomparableefficiency robots possess, different industries are gradually replacing human l abour. Because of the adoption of robots, thousands of works are dismissed from their workand they have to seek other occupations. In addition, if people are overly dependenton these machines, our society will fall into the chaos once robots cannot functionnormally, not only for the industrial production but also people’s daily lives.To sum u p, although robots may b ring the problems like reducing job opportunities and over reliance on them, they do make the production more efficient and free people from heavy work.10 月 19 日写作预测三It is known to all that the technological and scientific advances have made greaterchanges to the range and quality of our food. Some p eople regard it as an improvement while others believe that the change is harmful. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.范文：Scientific advances have an impact on many aspects of our lives, including food.I believe that the increase in food varieties can be beneficial to mankind, althoughthere are some problems.The development of food technology can be beneficial to the health of many p eople. This is because they are provided with a wider range of high-quality choices to adopt a balanced diet. For example, some perishables such as fruit and vegetables can bepreserved and made available for people in cold climates.Some diet supplements havealso been developed to improve the nutrition of our diet and promote our well-being.On the other hand, some people argue that the application of advanced foodtechnology can pose health risks, although it can give us more options in our diet.Genetic engineering, for instance, modifies the genetic characteristics of naturalcrops, but the health consequence of eating these crops is yet to be known. In addition,some chemicals have been used to increase the shelf life of some foodstuffs, despitethe fact that these chemicals can harm our health.In my v iew, the agricultural industry is able to feed a growing population because of technological advances. The main reason for this development is that technologymakes a variety of crops resistant to pests and diseases and also enables these crops to grow faster. This can boost food production. These emerging technologies areespecially important for developing countries or heavily populated countries, wheremany people suffer from malnutrition.10 月 19 日写作预测四News media has become more influential in people's lives. Others believe it isa negative development. To what extent do you agree or disagree.范文The causality may f ail to be persuasive between the increasing influence of news media to people and the negatives this trend may b ring about, and I would argue in this essay how unreasonable the claim in the prompt is.For those attributing some bad consequences to the development of news media, theymay superficially see the surface instead of the truth hidden behind every negative development. It is true that when people are more capable to learn about news through mass media, they may be more easily affected by the afterward thinking of such information. This is even more obvious when bad news, or the controversial one comes–the news of calamities, crimes or scandals, etc.—from the stream media, or news network, because people can get access to those coverages without too many barriersand may b e easily terrified by linking the possibilities of the re-emergence of those contents with their own life, or form their own opinion by leaning towards one sideof those controversies, some of which are lack of rationality. The social panic andsome extreme public consensus then emerge, and this anti-promotes the supposedly harmonious society into an unsecured way.Whereas the myopic thinking listed preclude people’ｓ ability from seeing past the appearance that leads to those detrimental effects, and robs them of the opportunities to recognize the true cruxes that lie behind. Social phenomena, positive or negative, never come for just one reason, and even if those aforementioned panic or disputesare sourced from the news encountered by the learners, the media is still not the oneto blame: it is the information itself that provokes those unfavored reactions, orshould I say even there is no such media, or even no news injections, other types of information—rumors, gossips, etc.—would lead people to those worries and public opinions anyway, because they emerge alongside the social community and every wordfrom the narrators within it, but not what medium is involved, or even not whetherit is news or not. It is therefore sad to say those considering the increasinglyinfluential news media as the culprit are manifesting their recklessness, because it is not the premise, but just the useful method that helps people distinguish more truths from the chaos of information injections.In conclusion, I would very much agree that before scrutinizing whether one thing isleading to negative development, one should firstly set up the system of causalitythat can testify the true reasons lying behind the phenomenon; news media is clearlynot that reason.10 月 19 日写作预测五Nowadays, we rely on news for our knowledge, but we are uncertain about the truth ofnews. Should we believe journalists? What qualities should a good journalist orcorrespondent have?MODEL:News and newspapers are an indispensable part of our everyday life because they keepus connected with the outside world. This essay shall discuss whether or not we should believe the journalists and also explain the characteristics of a good journalist.On t he one hand, journalists are the only source of information and they indeed provide great service to the public with their talent and hard work. They make residents feel part of this global village by keeping them in touch with it. Sometimes they can even disclose the social problems and provide justice. On the other hand, we should takethe information with a pinch of salt as they are likely to spread ill-founded newsso as to attract public’ｓ attention. Apart from that, news content occasionally ispre-set and modified based on journalists subjective views. In China, for example,journalists may hide the truth when high-profile people commit crimes such as rapes.A good journalist should have many qualities. First of all, there is a need for boldjournalists, unafraid to present the truth. Sometimes the truth is unsavoury ordamaging, but despite that, the truth is still paramount. Nothing should be hiddenbecause of self-interest or bias because there is a responsibility to the public toshow transparency. Furthermore, credibility and expertise are needed for a goodjournalist. With advancements in technology, the dissemination of information isinstantaneous and coming from innumerable sources, some without much confirmation of credibility. We need good journalists in society to interpret the vast amounts ofavailable information, understand the context and importance, and sift through theinformation to determine source integrity.In conclusion, I believe that we c an choose to trust the journalists because they bring us the latest news ranging from entertainment to current affairs. Good journalistsare those with integrity, responsibility and expertise.。