英文论文审稿意见汇总1、目标和结果不清晰。

It is no ted that your manu script n eeds careful edit ing by some one with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader.2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。

In general, there is a lack of explanation of replicates and statistical me thods used in the study.. Furthermore, an expla natio n of why the authors did these various experime nts should be provided.3、对于研究设计的ratio nale:Also, there are few expla nati ons of the rati on ale for the study desig n. 4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨：The con clusi ons are overstated. For example, the study did not showif the side effects from initial copper burst can be avoid with the polymer formulation.5、对hypothesis的清晰界定：A hypothesis n eeds to be prese nted 。

6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念：What was the rati on ale for the film/SBF volume ratio?7、对研究问题的定义:Try to set the problem discussed in this paper in more clear,write one sect ion to defi ne the problem&如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literature review:The topic is novel but the application proposed is not so novel.9、对 claim,如 A >B 的证明，verification:There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work, so it is impossible to judge whether the algorithm is an improveme nt on previous work.10、严谨度问题：MNQ is easier than the primitive PNQS, how to prove that.11、格式（重视程度）：In additi on, the list of references is not in our style. It is close but notcompletely correct.I have attached a pdf file with "I nstructi ons for Authors" which shows examples. .Before submitting a revision be sure that your material is properly prepared and formatted. If you are un sure, please con sult the formatti ng n struct ions to authors that aregive n un der the "I nstruct ions and Forms" butt on in he upper right-ha nd corner of the scree n.12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）：有关语言的审稿人意见:It is no ted that your manu script n eeds careful edit ing by some one with expertise in technical English editing paying particular attention to English grammar, spelling, and sentence structure so that the goals and results of the study are clear to the reader. . The authors must have their work reviewed by a proper tran slatio n/reviewi ng service before submissi on; on ly the n can a proper review be performed. Most sentences contain grammatical an d/or spell ing mistakes or are not complete senten ces..As presented, the writing is not acceptable for the journal. There are problems with sentence structure, verb ten se, and clause con struct ion.. The En glish of your manu script must be improved before resubmissi on. We str onglysuggest that you obtain assistance from a colleague who is well-versed i n En glish or whose n ative Ian guage is En glish.. Please have some one compete nt in the En glish Ian guage and the subject matte r of your paper go over the paper and correct it. ?.the quality of English needs improving.来自编辑的鼓励：En courageme nt from reviewers:. I would be very glad to re-review the paper in greater depth once it has be en edited because the subject is in terest ing.. There is continued in terest in your manu script titled " " which you subm itted to the Journal of Biomedical Materials Research: Part B - Applied Biomaterials.♦The Submissi on has bee n greatly improved and is worthy of publicati on.老外写的英文综述文章的审稿意见Ms. Ref. No.: ******Title: ******Materials Science and Engin eeri ngDear Dr. ******,Reviewers have now comme nted on your paper. You will see that they are advis ing that you revise your manu script. If you are prepared to un dertake the work required, I would be pleased to recon sider my decisi on.For your guida nee, reviewers' comme nts are appe nded below.Reviewer #1: This work proposes an exte nsive review on micromulsi on-based methods for the syn thesis of Ag nan oparticles. As such, the matter is of in terest, however the paper suffers for two serious limits:1) the overall quality of the En glish Ian guage is rather poor;2) some Figures must be selected from previous literature to discuss also the syn thesis of ani sotropically shaped Ag nan oparticles (there are several examples published), which has bee n largely overlooked throughout the paper.;Once the above concerns are fully addressed, the manu script could be accepted for publicati on in this jour nal这是一篇全过程我均比较了解的投稿，稿件的内容我认为是相当不错的，中文版投稿于业内有较高影响的某核心期刊，并很快得到发表。