Demonstrated OEE > Required OEE? (Is Z > Q?)
Predicted Good Parts / Week APW MPW
100%
Req'd OEE at APW
Req'd OEE at MPW
Surrogate Demonstrated OEE
90% 80% 70%
Capacity Planning
A. New Model Required OEE A1) Supplier & Part Information
Supplier Name Location/Site Code Part Name Part Number
A2) Capacity Requirements
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
SUPPLIER OPERATION MANAGEMENT APPROVAL
Version 4.3
FOR STA USE
Approved Authorized Representative Name / Title Email
Insert Signature Image from file
APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result APW Result MPW Result
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
B2) Process Specific Weekly Part Estimate [P * Z]
Process Description
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
C. Gap Analysis - Required OEE vs. Demonstrated OEE; Predicted Good Parts / Week
[J / P]
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Percent of parts reworked (re-run through process) Can process contain its changeover, scrap & rework assumptions? [Is J/(100%-H) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N) <= P] % Remaining for Availability & Performance Efficiency losses {P - [(J/(100%-H)) + (JxR) + (G1x60xG2/N)]} / P Enter any other assumptions for clarification
APW Plan
MPW Plan
APW Plan
MPW Plan
APW Plan
MPW Plan
APW Plan
MPW Plan
APW Plan
MPW Plan
APW Plan
MPW Plan
APW Plan
MPW Plan
APW Plan
MPW Plan
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Required OEE
Process 8
APW Plan MPW Plan
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A5) Required Good Parts / Week
H J Percent of parts scrapped Req'd Good Parts / Week to Support Next Process [Process 1 Req'd Parts = Process 2 Req'd Parts / Avg. Weekly Max Weekly (100% - Process 2 Scrap%)] Required Incoming Parts for -
Capacity Requirements A4) Planned Departmental Operating Pattern & Net Available Time
A B C D E F G G1 G2 Process description (in value stream order) Days / Week Shifts / Day Total Hours / Shift Contractual Planned Downtime - lunch, breaks, etc. (minutes/shift) Allocation Percent (enter 100 for dedicated) Net Available Time (hours / week) [B*C*(D-(E/60))*F] Planned Minutes per Changeover (into this part #) Planned Changeover Frequency / Week (into this part #)
Supplier to demonstrate APW of Supplier to demonstrate MPW of
Process 1
APW Plan MPW Plan
parts per week operating no more than 5 days per week parts per week operating no more than 6 days per week
Program Code Model Year Date of Study
<PA> Requirements
APW
MPW
A3) Key Contacts
Name
STA Site Engineer Supplier Lead Ford Buyer
Phone #
Email
Source of Capacity Requirements
Process 3
APW Plan MPW Plan
Process 2
APW Plan MPW Plan
Process 4
APW Plan MPW Plan
Process 5
APW Plan MPW Plan
Process 6
APW Plan MPW Plan
Process 7
APW Plan MPW Plan
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
A7) Shared Process - Total Allocation Plan
U
Enter Total % Allocation from "Shared - Loading Plan" Tab
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
B. Supplier Demonstrated OEE - Surrogate Historical Performance
K L M N P Q R S T Ideal Cycle Time per Tool or Machine (sec/cycle) # of Tools or Machines in parallel # of identical parts produced per Tool or Machine Cycle Net Ideal Cycle Time (sec/part) [K / (L*M)] Theoretical Parts per week at 100% OEE [G x 3600 / N]
B1) Surrogate Performance (from Surrogate OEE Summary)
Process Description V W X Y Z Supplier Name Supplier Location Site Code for Surrogate Process Surrogate Customer & Program Reference (~Ford P221) List reference Surrogate Process (~Stamping Press #12) Average Surrogate OEE Enter any other assumptions for clarification (Part Number, Annual Volume, Operating Pattern, etc.)
NOTES
OEE %
60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10%
0%
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%