2019年12月11日托福写作机经综合写作独立写作Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.这是一道绝对词题（题干出现the best，the most important等字眼），反对比较好写，一个实用易学的破解角度是"承合驳绝"，即承认合理性，反驳绝对性。

三个主体段能够这么写，1.承认合理性（这段也能够合并进开头段）：Visiting museums does have some advantages, i.e. a wide range of carefully selected and beautifully arranged materials；save time and money2.指出不足：the amount of information in museums is limited and not as lively as when it is presented in real life. Besides, museums usually only provide a singe perspective on major historic events and modern issues.3.提出更好的 (必要的逻辑环节)：there are better ways to learn about a country like traveling to that country or talking with friends as well as strangers from that country.另外两种主体段分段能够是1.承认合理性2.problem：the amount of information in museums islimited and not as lively as when it is presented in reallifesolution： there are better ways to learn about acountry like traveling to that country to see it yourself3.problem： museums usually only provide a singe perspective on major historic events and modern issues.Solution： talking with friends as well as strangersfrom that country provide you additional point of views一边倒1.things in the museum do not look as lively as when itis presented in real life2.the amount of information in museums is limited and doesn't reflect the diversity of people's interests3.museums usually only provide a singe perspective on major historic events and modern issues.如果同意，比较一些其它很好／很重要的方式(必要的逻辑环节)，指出参观博物馆仍是的。

范文Disagree.Visiting museums is not the best way to learn about a country.Boasting of a vast collection and combination of various exhibits, museums are an elegant gesture of humancivilizations. They provide a scene for us to be immersed ina foreign country without requiring us to step out of our own. To learn best about a country, however, visiting museums can hardly be perceived as a satisfactory way. I would strongly recommend a visit to that country and chat with foreignfriends for the following reasons.First and foremost, museums are unlikely to give an impression as vivid as a real experience does. The verbal descriptions or picture or videos in the museum, no matterhow expressive they are, cannot relate to visitors as well as a real setting. If you want to know more about Venice, you need to ride a boat, floating over the river between twoarrays of village houses. If you want to know more about Paris, you need to put your feet up to the Eiffel Tower, overlooking the flamboyant colors of that fashion paradise.If you want to know more about New York, you need to waveyour hands to the mighty woman with a torch in her hands asif saying "I lift my lamp beside the golden door". None ofthis kind of exciting experience can be achieved by playing with a miniature, let alone reading a piece of document or watching a short film.Additionally, as many exhibits as a museum can collect, they are far from enough to represent what a country is truly like. The problem for museums is that they have limited space, so they have to decide what's important and what's not. Museums typically include that country's ancient artifactsand documents of major historical events. And in practice,the judgments of the group of academics that make these decisions don't reflect the great range of interests that people in that country really have. But space is definitelynot an issue if you travel to that country or chat withforeign friends or even strangers. That country's history can still be learnt from traveling or chatting with natives, but there can be a great variety of things and topics that accurately reflect the great diversity of interests of people in that country. You get to learn what music they put into ears, what idols they go crazy for, and what food they make at home and delight in at food stands. The diversity of knowledge that travelling or chatting can offer is one of their strongest advantages.Even on historic issues where museums have expertise, they do not stand a chance against a debate with natives. This is because museums usually only provide a singe perspective on major historic events and modern issues, based on opinions of some authorities. When I learned American history at school, I was curious about what kind of impact that American Revolutionary war, the civil war, the Vietnam War had on its people. Although the school teacher had taken us to the biggest museum in Beijing, I didn't feel so strong about it. It was not until I actually talked in Texas with a veteran from the Vietnam War did I realize how difficult that period of time had been for them. Their opinions were divergent from and supplementary to what's written in the texts in the museum, but their unanimous hope for peace was clear. Had I not been to America, had I not conversed with real people there, I would never have been able to see these things in a multiplicity of angles.To wrap up, visiting museums is not without its advantages, but to get a clearer picture of what a country looks like, I would encourage you to put your feet on the land of that country or relate to the local people. No doubtyou will have a vivid experience, understand what local people are really interested in and see things from perspectives that are very different from museums'.文章第二个理由段借鉴了Tpo6 综合写作听力素材。