试卷类型：A潍坊市高考模拟考试英语2019.4注意事项：1. 答题前，考生务必将自己的姓名、考生号等填写在答题卡和试卷指定位置上。

2. 回答选择题时，选出每小题答案后，用铅笔把答题卡上对应题目的答案标号涂黑。

如擦干净后，再选涂其他答案标号。

回答非选择题时，将答案写在答题上，试卷上无效。

3.考试结束后，将本试卷和答题卡一并交回。

第一部分听力（共两节，满分30分）该部分分为第一、第二两节。

注意：回答听力部分时，请先将答案标在试卷上。

听力部分结束前，你将有两分钟的时间将你的答案转涂到答题卡上。

第一节（共5小题；每小题1.5分，满分7.5分）听下面 5 段对话。

每段对话后有一个小题，从题中所给的 A、B、C 三个选项中选出最佳选项，并标在试卷的相应位置。

听完每段对话后，你都有10 秒钟的时间来回答有关小题和阅读下一小题。

每段对话仅读一遍。

1. What will the man do this weekend?A. Meet his professor.B. See a movie.C. Do a project.2. How much will the man pay?A. $50.B. $100.C. $200.3. Where will the speakers go?A. To a Thai restaurant.B. To an Italian restaurant.C. To a Mexican restaurant.4. What does the man mean?A. The film is terrible.B. The film can be seen online.C. The film is worth the money.5. Where does the conversation probably take place?A. At home.B. At a hospital.C. At a drug store.第二节（共15小题；每小题1.5分，满分22.5分）听下面 5 段对话或独白。

每段对话或独白后有几个小题，从题中所给的 A、B、C 三个选项中选出最佳选项，并标在试卷的相应位置。

听每段对话或独白前，你将有时间阅读各个小题，每小题 5 秒钟；听完后，各小题将给出 5 秒钟的作答时间。

每段对话或独白读两遍。

听第 6 段材料，回答第 6、7 题。

6. Why does the woman call the man?A. To change the address.B. To check on a delivery..C. To order a pair of shoes.7. When will the shoes arrive?A. On March 10th.B. On March 7th.C. On March 5th.听第 7 段材料，回答第 8、9 题。

8. What problem does the woman have?A. She has lost her way.B. She can't find a shoe store.C. Her shoes make her uncomfortable.9. Why do the speakers come to the city?A. To make a tour.B. To attend a meeting.C. To buy some shoes.听第 8 段材料，回答第 10 至 12 题。

10. Why does the man want to get a summer job?A. To get some experience.B. To earn money for a trip.C. To save money for a course.11. How will the woman get money?A. By doing a part-time job.B. By borrowing from her brother.C. By asking her parents for help.12. What does the man decide to do in the end?A. Study in Spain.B. Get a job in Portugal.C. Go to Latin America with the woman.听第 9 段材料，回答第 13 至 16 题。

13. Which city does the man book a shuttle bus for?A. London.B. Milton.C. Toronto.14. When is the man due to arrive at the Toronto airport?A. At 11:30.B. At 12:00.C. At 12:30.15. Why is the man advised to book a return ticket in advance?A. To get a seat.B. To have a coffee.C. To collect his luggage.16. What's the probable relationship between the speakers?A. Driver and passenger.B. Manager and assistant.C. Customer and receptionist.听第 10 段材料，回答第 17 至 20 题。

17. Why did Fagin come to the speaker?A. To. rent her house.B. To buy her house.C. To decorate her house.18. Why was the speaker hesitant about Fagin's offer?A. She disliked him.B. The money was not much.C. They'd damage some of her possessions.19. How long did it take to prepare the house for the film?A. Four days.B. Two weeks.C. A month.20. What did the speaker do when the crew left?A. She watched the film.B. She visited her relatives.C. She repainted the living room.第二部分阅读理解（共两节，满分40分）第一节（共 15 小题；每小题 2 分，满分 30 分）阅读下列短文，从每题所给的四个选项（A、B、C 和 D）中，选出最佳选项，，ABroad Band: by Claire L. Evans. Portfolio，2018 ( $27)Though often outnumbered by men，women stayed in che booming field of computing. In this inspiring tale，writer Evans records the contributions of someof the many women who aided the rise of the modern Inlernet.Memorable characters include Elizabeth "Jake" Feinler，an information scientist who helped researchers navigate the Arpane and Stacy Horn，who started one of the first social networks ，Echo.The Wizard and the Prophet:by Charles C. Mann. Knopf，2018( $28.95)The human population is moving toward 10 billion - some experts tliink we'll nearly hit that mark by 2050. How will.the earth feed，house and otherwisesupport such a crowd? Environmental thinkers usually fall into one of twocamps:those who prefer conservation and' controlling consumption ， like WilliamVogt，and those who trust innovation to solve our problems，Norman Borlaug，for example. Writer Mann carefully records the lives and thought of the founders of these two philosophies.A Lab of One's Own:by Patricia Fara. Oxford University Ptess，2018( $24.95)In World War I many women in the U.K.replaced their aprons with chemical suits and stepped into previously male-only fields of science，where they led war research efforts. Science historian Fara illustrates thelives of many of these forgotten women. Although the era marked a majorstep forward for women scientists，many worked for small wages in an environment of discrimination. In the nearly 100 years since，women have come a long way，Fara writes，but the glass ceilings remain solid and the pipelines leaky.Atom Land:by Jon Butterworth. The Experiment，2018( $19.95)Butterworth takes readers on an amusing journey through the unknown world of particle (粒子) physics. The first stop is "Atom Land，" whereButterworth explains how electrons，protons and neutrons come together to build up everything we know. As the joumey unfolds，we learn about lesser-known particles. Thankfully，our ship is equipped with tools such as mathematical equations （方程式）anda "laser light" that lights up the darkest of concepts.21. Who focuses on the future of our earth?A. Claire L. Evans.B. CharlesC. Mann.C. Patricia Fara.D. Jon Butterworth.22. Which books will you probably read if you are interested in women's career?A. Broad Band & Atom Land.B. The Wizard and the Prophet & Atom Land.C.Broad Ban.d & A Lab of One's Own.D.A Lab of One's Own & Atom Land.23. What's the purpose in writing the text?A. To clarify some concepts.B. To iritroduce some famous writers.C. To give the book reviews.D. To recommend the books.BAdrian Lamo，a Colombian-American threat analyst and former hacker，died in Sedgwic-k County，Kansas on Friday，at the age of 37. He was best known for passing on information that led to the arrest of Chelsea Manning.Lamo first gained media attention in the early 2000s for breaking into several high-profile computer networks，including those of The New York Times，Yahoo，and Microsoft，ending in his 2003 arrest when he eventually turned himself in.However，Lamo gained.worldwide ill reputation in 2010 for disclosing to the FBI that the U. S. soldierr Chelsea Manning had leaked confidential information to Wikileaks. Manning had reached out to Lamo via a messagin8 app and told him that he had gained access to hundreds of thousands of classified documents and had leaked to Wikileaks a video of U. S. military forces ina helicoptermachine madly gunning down journalists and Iraqi civilians. But，Lamo chose toreport him and informed the U. S. military of the leak.Held responsible for the biggest leak of classified data in U. S. history， Manning wasdeclared guilty by court martial and was sentenced to 35 years in prison，but was granted mercyby former President Barack Obama，who said his prison term was" disproportionate".Looking back on his decision to give up Manning，Lamo told US News and World Report in 2017 that it was "not his most honorable moment".However，he added that he had leamed a lot from the experience，including that "you can't really know a person or their motives unless you've sat where they sat and seen the situationthrough their eyes，no matter how much you believe you do".24. What type of writing is this text?A. A biography.B. A fiction.C. A news repmt.D. A critical essay.25. What made Adrian Lamo have a bad name all over the world?A. Tuming FBI in.B. Giving up Chelsea Manning.C. Hacking some famous networks.D. Leaking military information to Wikileaks.26. What does the underlined word" dispropmtionate" mean in paragraph 4？A. Fair.B. Ambiguous.C. Improper.D. Acceptable.27. What does Adrian Lamo imply by his words in the last paragraph?A. Honesty is the best policy.B. Put yourseK in others' shoes.C. A friend is easier lost than found.D. Don't judge a person by hi8 appearance.CChsrity is simple in theory:A heart warms，a hand reache8 out. In practice，though，charity can become a troubled mix of motives and consequences. Giving can be driven by guilt，duty，praise,or perhaps the hope that Spiving will somehow make up for past cruelty or ignorance. Too little charity is far less than valuable. Too much can cause dependence which makes the receiver Continuously ask for more.Giving from the heart is good.But critics have long worried about misdirected charity that dose more harm than good. In his 2012 book，" Harmful Charity:How Churches and Charities Hurt Those They Help (And How to Solve the Problem)，" Robert Lupton，an experienced social worker of 40 years of community work in inner-city Atlanta，argues that charity must not do for the poor what they can do for themselves.Due to emergencies such as natural disasters，the afterward financial aid is greatly welcome. Mr. Lupton advocates it should focus on the development of self-supporting. The task can be carried out via，for instance，offering microloans，hiring local builders and suppliers，and trying to found self-supported，locally owned and operated enterprises. What seldom works，he argues，are untargeted handouts from far-off providers and the sudden arrival of inexperienced volunteer-tourists hoping to earn personal reputation by digging wells or mending roofs that locals are perfectly able to take care of themselves.Getting charity right isn't easy. But from money raising to the boom in volunteering among Millennials (千禧一代），from the increasing worldwide willingness to give to the efforts by charity organizations to become more effective and fruitful，there is strong evidence that human beings' ability of taking care of others is growing along with their ability to help without harming.Charity can be as simple as holding the door for a stranger and as complex as a global campaign to get rid of malaria(疟疾). Charity works best when it retums the weak to strength，when it helps a small town shaken by a heavy earthquake get back on its feet. A successful charity is one that eventually is no longer needed.28. Why have critics worried about misdirected charity?A. It may do harm to receivers.B. It may cause independence.C. It can be driven by guilt.D. It can be encouraged by duty.29. What can be a proper way to give charity in time of natural disasters?A. Hiring far-off volunteers.B. Digging wells for victims.C. Giving out untargeted handouts.D. Helping locals to be self-supported.30. What can we learn from paragraph 4?A. It's easy to give charity without harming.B. Millennials are volunteering to raise money..C. People's ability of giving; charity is improving.D. Charity organizations.are spreading all over the world.31. What is the main idea of the text?A. The world is in need of charity.B. It's necessary to get charity right.C. Charity do.es more good than harm.D. Giving charity is helping ourselves.DKaitlin Woolley and Ayelet Fishbach report in Psychological Science that a meal taken "family-style" from a central plate can greatly improve the outcome of later negotiations.Having conducted previous research in 2017 revealing that eating similar foods led to people feeling emotionally closer to one another，Dr Woolley and Dr Fishbach wondered whether the way in which food was served also had a psychological effect. They theorized that，on the one hand，sharing food with other people might indicate food scarcity (短缺）and increase a feeling of competition. However，they also reasoned that it could instead lead people to become more aware of others' needs and drive cooperative behavior as a result. Curious to find out，they did a series of experiments.For the first test they recruited 100 pairs of participants from a local cafe，none of whom knew each other. The participants were seated at a table and fed tortilla chips with salsa. Half the pairs were given their own basket of 20 grams of chips and a bowl of 25 grams of salsa，and half were given 40 grams of chips and 50 grams of salsa to share. As a cover for the experiment，all participants were told this snack was to be consumed before the game began.The game asked the participants to negotiate an hourly wage rate during a fictional strike. Each person was randomly assigned to represent the union or management and follow a set of rules.The researchers measured cooperation by noting the number of rounds it took to reach an agreement，and found that those who shared food resolved the strike significantly faster ( in 8.7 rounds) than those who did not (13.2 rounds). A similar experiment was conducted with 104 participants and Goldfish crackers( 4cA:f) ，this time negotiating an airline's route prices. Theresults were much the same，with the food-sharers negotiating successfully 63.3o'/o of the time and those who did not share doing so 42.9% of the time.32. What does the "family-style" meal in the report refer to?A. A meal taken at home.B. A meal shared with others.C. A meal consumed by oneself.D. A meal taken in a family atmosphere.33. For what purpose did the researchers carry out the present experiments?A. To show the way food is served.B. To prove sharing food increases competition.C. To confirm sharing food can promote cooperation.D. To find out whether sharing food can get people close emotionally.34. Why were participants asked to eat up the snack before the game?A. To add to their energy.B. To rewaid them for their partcipationC. To hide the intention of the experiment.D. To avoid the distraction during. the game.35. How did Dr Woolley and Dr Fishbach prove their point of view?A. By making a questionnaire.B. By giving participants interviews.C. By analysing the reasons for cooperation.D. By comparing the results of the experiments.第二节（共5 小题；每小题2 分，满分10 分）根据短文内容，从短文后的选项中选出能填入空白处的最佳选项。