当代中国马克思主义哲学研究范式:反思与前瞻解放思想、改革开放30年来,中国的马克思主义哲学研究范式经历了一个由单一向多样的转变过程。

梳理、反思马克思主义哲学研究范式的变迁历史、现实样态、存在问题,展望其发展趋势和未来走向,对进一步深化马克思主义哲学研究具有极为重要的基础性意义。

2007年10月由中国社会科学杂志社和苏州大学政治与公共管理学院共同举办的第七届马克思哲学论坛的主题即:“马克思主义哲学研究范式:反思与前瞻”。

根据会议发言,我们约请相关专家撰写了本组文章。

其中,苏州科技大学任平教授提出:“出场学”研究视域即探索马克思主义出场问题的哲学范式。

该研究范式强调在历史语境、出场路径与出场形态三者关联中系统研究马克思主义哲学创新发展的逻辑,包括历史与哲学两个地平线、四大模块的理解范式。

从历史到当代的地平线转换,推动了马克思主义哲学地平线从“当年”到“当代”的发展,从而构成马克思主义哲学创新发展的总体逻辑。

中国人民大学哲学院郭湛教授认为:30年来中国马克思主义哲学具有范式转换意义的发展,可从理论与实践、存在与规律、主体与活动、生产与发展、文明与交往五方面来讨论。

在这些范式转换中,主体与活动方面更具核心意义,其中的主体与活动的性质问题尤为重要。

从主体性到公共性,是主体与活动性质演变的大趋势,也是马克思主义哲学范式转换的根本走向。

南京大学马克思主义社会理论研究中心张亮副教授通过对中国马克思主义哲学史传统范式的生成历史及研究者对各种新范式的建构尝试的反思,指出:传统范式是中国学者在独特的中国语境中,融合优秀的传统治学方式后自主再创造的结晶;而新范式的建构尝试则推进了中国马克思主义哲学走向繁荣。

目前中国马克思主义哲学史学科以马克思主义为指导的多元并存格局,仅具有历史的合理性与进步性,最终将被真正的历史科学所超越。

Ξ　本文为教育部人文社会科学重点项目“坚持马克思主义在意识形态指导地位研究”阶段性成果。

论马克思主义哲学研究的出场学视域Ξ任 平一、出场学:探索马克思主义出场问题的哲学范式哲学范式总是时代思维方式的集中体现。

探索马克思主义出场问题、进而提出出场学范式首先基于一个时代性挑战。

“这是一个脱节的时代!”———1993年,《哈姆莱特》的这一句戏词,被法国思想家德里达在《马克思的幽灵》一书中用来指认一个并非完全没有戏剧性效果的“历史事实”:在旧工业化与资本全球化时代出场的马克思主义,遭遇新全球化时代,导致一系列事件的发生:苏东剧变和冷战结束,美国新全球霸权主义,恐怖主义和反恐怖战争,生态主义和绿色政治,知识经济和消费社会,反思现代性与后现代思潮的冲击,族性政治与文明冲突等等,・4・ Social Sciences in ChinaA bi mont hl y N o.4J ul y 2008ABSTRACTS(1)R esearch Paradigms in Marxist Philosophy in Contemporary China :R etrospect and ProspectRen Pi n g ,Guo Zhan and Zhang L i an g ・4・Over t he t hree decades since China launched it s campaign for emancipating t he mind and reform and opening up ,t he unitary research paradigm of Marxist p hilo sop hy has gradually given place to multiple perspectives.It is of f undamental significance for t he deepening of Marxist p hilo sop hical st udies to sort out and reflect on t he t ransition p rocess ,act ual configuration and current issues in paradigms of Marxist p hilo sop hy ,and to explore t heir f ut ure directions.For t his reason ,t he Sevent h Marxist Philo sop hy Forum was jointly held by t he Social Sciences in China Press and t he School of Politics and Public Administration of Soochow U niversity in October 2007,under t he title “Research paradigms in Marxist p hilosop hy in contemporary China :ret rospect and p ro spect."The following articles are based on t he conference speeches.According to Professor Ren Ping of Suzhou U niversity of Science and Technology ,t he “ent ry"vision is a p hilo sop hical paradigm probing t he issue of Marxism πs entry into real life.This paradigm includes two horizons (history and p hilosop hy )and four modules ,and emp hasizes t he systematic st udy of t he logic of Marxist p hilo sop hy πs innovative develop ment t hrough connecting t he historical context ,entry pat h and ent ry pattern of Marxist p hilo sop hy.The switch f rom t he historical to t he contemporary horizon has facilitated t he develop ment of Marxist p hilosop hy f rom “t he old days"to “present times ,"and t hus co nstit utes t he overall logic of Marxist p hilosop hy πs innovative develop ment.Professor Guo Zhan from t he School of Philosop hy of Renmin University of China holds t hat t he paradigm shift s Marxist p hilosop hy in China has undergone in t he course of it s develop ment over t he past t hirty years can be discussed f rom t he following five angles :t heory and p ractice ,existence and laws ,subject and activity ,production and develop ment ,and civilization and intercommunication.Among t hese ,subject and activity is of crucial significance ,wit h t he question of t he nat ure of subject and activity being of particular importance.The change f rom a subjective to a p ublic nat ure is a great t rend in t he evolution of t he nat ure of subject and activity ,and t he f undamental direction of t he paradigm shift in Marxist p hilo sop hy.Associate Professor Zhang Liang f rom t he Center for St udies of Marxist Social Theory at Nanjing U niversity reflect s on t he formation of t he t raditional paradigm of Marxist p hilo sop hical history in China and researchers πtentative const ruction of various new paradigms.He argues t hat t he traditional paradigm was t he outcome of Chinese scholars πintegration of t he best t raditional research app roaches wit h t heir own independent innovations in China πs particular context ,and t hat t he const ruction of new paradigms has contributed to t he flourishing of Marxist p hilo sop hy in China.The current pattern of t he discipline of Marxist p hilosop hical history is characterized by t he coexistence of diversity under t he guidance of Marxism.Being merely historically reasonable and progressive ,it will finally be transcended by t he real science of history.(2)On the Inference Rule of Legal Logic X iong M i ng hui ・26・The inference rule is a core subject of research on logic.Legal logic is a branch of applied logic.However ,it is not t he simple application of t he inference rule of formal logic to t he legal arena ,but t he integration of t he inference rule of formal logic wit h t he inference rule peculiar to t he legal area.Therefore ,a comparison of t he two shows t hey have somet hing in common but are distinct.What t hey have in co mmon is t he fact t hat t he basic inference rule of formal logic is an indispensable co mponent of t he inference rule of legal logic.Their distinctiveness lies in t he fact t hat t he inference rule in legal logic has an element lacking in formal logic ,i.e.t he “burden of p roof."(3)Marx πs Theory of Saving and Its Practical Signif icance H uan g Tiemi ao ・36・Marx πs t heory of saving is a necessary compo nent of historical materialism ,but so far it has・502・。