综合写作模板：According to the lecture and passage, there is a conflict of practices/hypothesis/opinions about whether the four-day working practice would benefit the economy, companies and employees. In the reading, the author points out three major aspects to support benefits brought by this new working practice, which, however, is refuted by the following lecture.First of all, contrary to the perspective in the reading, the professor assumes this shorter working practice would not increase profits of company,which totally disagrees with the statement in the reading. The evidence from the professor is that the four-day working practice would allow companies to spend much more money than before; specifically, hiring more employees w ill cost greater volume of money for training,medical benefits, which would be same no matter employees working for four or five days. What is more, the company would also spend more money on the more office space and computers. Thus, the counter-evidence proposed by the professor would totally refute the statement in the reading.In addition, unlike the statement in the reading, the speaker in the lecture believes the four-day working style, to large extent, cannot reduce the unemployment rate, which is fully contradictive in the reading passage. It is because the professor argues that hiring new employees would be very costly, more important, the company holds other options such as working overtime to make up the difference. Worse,the company would even raise their working expectation to ask their four-day employees to do the work as the same amount they used to do in five days.As a result, there is no additional job position to be created and the current working mood would be unpleasan t. Consequently, the statement in reading is totally challenged by the lecture. Lastly, different from the perspective in the reading passage, the professor also asserts that the quality of employees’ life would not be improved due to the shorter working practice, which contradicts the view in the reading. It is due to the fact from the lecture that the four-day workweek may undermine the job stability and harm the development of caree r. To demonstrate that, those employees would lose their jobs during the economic downturn, and can be ignored by the promotion which is given to employees with five working days. Thus, the point of view in the passage cannot be persuasive due to the evidence stated in the listening.In conclusion, based on the discussion in the lecture, it is very clearly to say that the professor makes the persuasive argument toward this issue to totally challenge ideas in the passage with many inaccuracies.Tpo12的小sample：First of all, contrary to the perspective in the reading, the professor assumes that the family permission cannot serve as the sound evidence to support the subject of paining would be Jane Austin in teenage time, which totally disagrees with the statement in the reading. The evidence from the professor is that the family permission to use this patining as the illustration in her edition of letter happened at her death for severaldecades, no one in her family has ever seen her face in person so that the family permission cannot approve the subject would be Jane Austin. Thus, the lecture from the professor would totally refute the statement in the reading.….. there was no one in her family who actually saw Jane Austin in person, since at that time when they gave permission to us e the painting as illustration, it was for several decades that Jane Austin has passed away, and therefore the family permission cannot function as the sound evidence to support the perspective in the passage.独立写作模板：A=BIn the present-day, there is a heated discussion about XXXX. Some people suggest that XXXXXX. At the meanwhile, another strain of opinions reckon that XXXXXX. As far as I am concerned, both of the two views have their own sound reasons.On one hand, convincing arguments can be made that XXXX have its XXXXXXX overwhelming advantages. First and most important point is that XXXXXX. For instance, XXXXXX. Aside from the forgoing point, it is commonly accepted that XXXXXXXX. One compelling example to my point is XXXXX.On the other hand, XXXXX has its irreplaceable significance in xxxxx. In the first place, it is undeniable that XXXXXX. An example of myself would aptly demonstrate my point is that xXXXXX. In the second place, only XXXXX can xxxx. There is no better illustration than the example of XXXXXX.Taking into account what we have discussed above, we can safely come to the conclusion that XXXXXXX.。