Hans Journal of Soil Science 土壤科学, 2019, 7(3), 233-241Published Online July 2019 in Hans. /journal/hjss https:///10.12677/hjss.2019.73029Influence of Different Modes of Straw Return on Characteristics of Cinnamon Soil Water Stable Aggregates and Soil PropertiesZhifan Zhu 1, Bing Chen 1, Guangna Zhang 1*, Yun Wang 2, Xianqi Huo 1, Dinghao Deng 2, Junxiang Yu 1, Yaqin Zheng 11College of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Linyi University, Linyi Shandong 2College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi ShandongReceived: Jul. 4th , 2019; accepted: Jul. 22nd , 2019; published: Jul. 29th , 2019Abstract The study researched on cinnamon soil in this area under different modes of straw return. Six treatments were set up as Control, (no fertilizer, no straw); C (chemical fertilizer input); Straw mulch (SM20, 20% of straw mulch with fertilizer); SR20 (20% straw return with fertilizer); SA20 (20% straw ash with fertilizer); Straw combustion (SC20, 20% of straw combustion with fertilizer), the treatments with chemical fertilizer were applied with the same amount. After 4 years of field experiment, 0 - 10 cm soil was collected for analysis of characteristics of cinnamon soil water sta-ble aggregates, soil chemical properties, as well as RDA relationship between them. Results showed that, all treatments beside C, the proportion of different grades of water stable aggregates were trended as 0.5 - 1 mm, <0.25 mm, 0.25 - 0.5 mm, 1 - 2 mm, >2 mm from large to small; Treat-ments of C, SR20 and SC20 increased >2 mm aggregates significantly; SM20, SR20 and SC20 in-creased 1 - 2 mm aggregates significantly; Treatments with chemical fertilization reduced 0.5 - 1 mm aggregates; Fertilization treatments all increased 0.25 - 0.5 mm aggregates except SC20; Only C treatment could increase <0.25 mm aggregate. RDA analysis showed that 0.5 - 1 mm aggregate, soil organic matter content, soil resin-P and nitrate nitrogen concentration are related to axis 1, which explained 57.2% of total variable; Soil available P and −3NO -N concentration are positivelyrelated with <0.25 mm aggregate; Soil 4NH -N + and CaCO 3 contents positively related with 1 - 2mm aggregate and mean weight diameter. Results indicated that 4 years of straw return and strawcombustion had more stable aggregates than other treatments, high amount of soil +4NH -N andresin-P concentration were found in SC20 treatment, while all modes of straw input to soil could maintain more resin-P and −3NO -N than control treatment. RDA analysis showed proportion of different soil aggregate grade influenced soil available nutrients contents and stable characteris-tics of water stable aggregate. KeywordsStraw Return Modes, Cinnamon Soil, Water Stable Aggregates, Mean Weight Diameter, RDA Analysis*通讯作者。
朱志凡 等秸秆还田对褐土水稳性团聚体特征及土壤化学性质的影响朱志凡1，陈 冰1，张广娜1*，王 芸2，霍宪启1，邓丁浩2，于军香1，郑亚琴11临沂大学农林科学学院，山东 临沂 2临沂大学资源环境学院，山东 临沂收稿日期：2019年7月4日；录用日期：2019年7月22日；发布日期：2019年7月29日摘要为探讨不同玉米秸秆不同方式还田对褐土水稳性团聚体特征及土壤理化性状的影响，于处理4年后2017年6月采集对照不施肥(CK)、施肥(C)、20%秸秆覆盖(SM20)、20%秸秆还田(SR20)、20%秸秆灰分(SA20)和20%秸秆焚烧(SC20)处理0~10 cm 层的原状土壤，通过室内筛分处理后，测定土壤水稳性团聚体特征及土壤化学性质。
研究表明，除C 处理外，水稳性团聚体分布从大到小依次为0.5~1 mm ，<0.25 mm ，0.25~0.5 mm ，1~2 mm ，>2 mm ；SR20和SC20处理平均重量直径(MWD)最高；处理C 、SR20和SC20显著增加>2 mm 粒级团聚体含量；SM20、SR20和SC20处理显著增加1~2 mm 粒级含量；各施肥处理显著降低0.5~1 mm 粒级含量；施肥处理除SC20外，均显著增加0.25~0.5 mm 粒级含量；仅C 处理显著增加<0.25 mm 粒级含量。
冗余分析发现0.5~1 mm 粒级水稳性团聚体含量、土壤有机质(OM)含量、有效磷(resin-P)含量、硝态氮(−3NO -N )含量与主轴相关，可解释总变量的57.2%；土壤有效磷含量、土壤−3NO -N含量与< 0.25 mm 粒级团聚体含量呈正向相关；土壤+4NH -N 含量、CaCO 3含量与1~2 mm 粒级团聚体含量和MWD 呈正向相关。
秸秆还田和秸秆焚烧4年后土壤水稳性团聚结构最稳定，秸秆焚烧处理土壤铵态氮和有效磷含量最高，各种秸秆方式还田均能维持较高的有效磷和硝态氮含量；冗余分析结果表明，不同粒级水稳性团聚体含量分布对土壤有效养分含量及团聚体的稳定性影响不一。
关键词还田方式，褐土，水稳性团聚体，平均重量直径，冗余分析Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and Hans Publishers Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). /licenses/by/4.0/1. 引言土壤团聚体是由有机质和矿物颗粒等土壤成分在冻融交替、干湿等自然条件下而形成的大小不同的多孔单元[1] [2]。
依据稳定性可分为水稳定性团聚体(抗水力分散)、稳定性团聚体(抗外力分散)、非稳定性团聚体(外力易分散) 三类。
其中稳定性团聚体为作物传输土壤养分、空气和水分，而非稳定性团聚体在破碎后发生迁移，从而堵塞孔隙，阻挡土壤水分和养分的迁移，加剧土壤侵蚀和地表径流[3]。
而具有良好水稳性团聚体结构的土壤，能够满足植物对养分、空气和水分的需求，且具有良好的抗冲抗蚀性能[4]。
秸秆还田是现代农业生产过程的重要技术措施，具有增加作物产量，提高土壤有机质含量，减少温朱志凡等室气体排放，增加土壤微生物生物量，改善农田生态环境的作用[5] [6] [7]。
秸秆作为重要的有机物料来源，我国年产8.1亿吨[8]，但现阶段我国秸秆利用率还较低。
作为土壤有机物料输入的主要来源和控制秸秆焚烧的主要举措，秸秆还田对土壤改良和大气环境保护均具有积极意义。
秸秆还田对不同土壤类型及耕作方式下的土壤团聚体影响差异较大。
冀保毅等(2015)研究发现，秸秆还田可增加黏土和壤土机械稳定性和水稳性团聚体的平均重量直径，从而使团聚体的稳定性增加[9]。
安婉丽等(2016)研究发现秸秆还田对早稻田土壤水稳性团聚体的稳定性影响不显著，但对晚稻田土壤水稳性团聚体稳定性影响显著[10]。