第一部部分外文文献原文部分中文2000字New thinking of contemporary western architecturalaestheticsOne of the most striking features of aesthetics of contemporary western architecture, is the change of aesthetic thinking. It is a rich epoch-making revolutionary change. As we know, the aesthetic thought of modern architecture, basically confined to the overallthinking, linear thinking, rational thinking this fixed,and even can be said to be rigid frame, it is difficult tobreak through the shackles of functionalism, rationalism. However, at present, in and promote the dual influence ofwestern contemporary philosophical and scientific thought, had the historical transformation of aesthetic thinking of contemporary architecture. It is completely out of thegeneral, linear and rational thinking inertia, towards anew thinking for a more contemporary nature's way.Non overall thinkingModern architectural geometry hegemony and pure aesthetics basically is a kind of in a flagrant way"oppressive totalisation" (his words) to control and guide the construction of aesthetic trend. When V enturi, Philip? Johnson et al to challenge the "oppressive totalisation", when the modern movement has become thriving in the construction field, modern unified pattern was quicklybroken, overall tanked. Unfortunately, when the postmodern architecture emerge in large numbers, the architects soon felt, they are likely to be as Jaspers said, "from a situation into another kind of situation", from an overall fall into another kind of overall. This replaces the aesthetic revolution another tyranny in a dictatorship, is a contemporary architects and scientists do not want to see, most cannot accept, therefore, all sorts of new architectural concepts since the anti-modernist movementuntil the emergence of resistance, all to the overall,pursuit diversity as a preventive and expel any form ofaesthetic autocracy charm monster banner.Adorno (Theodor W ? Adoeno, German philosopher) said, "the liberation of mankind does not mean to become a general". In order to carry out the communication and understanding between different races of human, reallyneed a standard of value, common ideals andcommon feelings,however, this does not mean that, human's political institutions, customs should follow the same general. Onthe aesthetic, specifically, on art and architecture, the general can only is an inert strength, even can say, it is the most terrible enemy of creativity.Terrible place overall is, it has a periodic attackmorbid inertial forces. When a art of totality was a fatal blow when, often is another kind of overall quietly out of. So Adorno thinks, if art is always a radical, it is always conservative. The strengthening phase separation and the dominant spirit of the illusion, "which in practice isinvalid and complicit did not reduce disaster is apparently painful". It was in one direction, and lost in the otherdirection; if art to bypass the disgraced historical logic, then it will have to pay a high price for this free, oneof which is difficult to meet the reproduction of historical logic. Adorno to escape from the overall hasbeen holding a contradiction, suspicion and even pessimistic attitude. He said, we can ignore the totality, but overall did not ignore us. As if the general is a kindof come a nd go like a shadow, as the shadow follows the form, unable to get rid of stuff. In his view, fled the totalityis neither possible nor necessary. Because you are against the general, "get in one direction, and lost in anotherdirection". However, most architects do not agree with his point of view, their ability to hope that through improvethe architects attention, perception and choice, give full play to the architect of the autonomy and capture and expression ability difference, in order to escape from the trap of totality.Philip? Judi Di ou (Philip Jodidio) Stephen Holzerknown as the ideological Architects (Steven Holl) said:"the unified construction and its compliance technique or style, irrational open let it to a place. It should be the same tendency to resist standardization...... New buildings must be formed in this way: it is a cross-cultural continuous adaptation, and poetic performance and personal environment and community adaptation." Holzer clearly opposed to any form of identity or overall, his ideal architecture, is both personal survival culture situation and environmental situation, but also has a certain heterogeneity architecture.Mofuxisi firm commanding general Tom Men has alwaysbeen a personal independence ofconduct is known, althoughhe did not like Bernard Tschumi and Michael Sorkin (Michael Sorkin), call ugly building, but he to architectural formand style and he ignored almost of the building structureand spatial attention as famous. He mounted the spell,false postmodernism with deep aversion, to the 80's popular false pluralism is a contemptuous disregard. He once said, "today, we have the common value system of evaluation ofour diverse world, in this world, the reality is chaotic, unpredictable, so it is unknown. The adventure has becomeour principles of operation...... One o f the central themes of today's building, is about an architect can in our environment, corrosion of autonomy, our sense of self and personal mental psychological and social forces independent action problem from within." Main and his researchers cooperation, attaches great importance to the art creation and personal independence. In their view, the individual should not be affected by the grand narrative(Grand Narrative) influence, should not be subject to themacro rationality, and should follow the guidelines forcreating self pure mission, go "narrative" that personalized road. Only in this way, the building can getrid of the same sex and overall cycle.With the design of Vienna Z bank G. Domini (Gunther Domenig), and the blue sky group Wolf? S (Wolf Prix) apparently Rex the building as a kind of narration andexpression of art. He sincerely hopes to the architect'sdesign and the writer's creation, fully draw, revelationand expression of complexity and diversity of our world.He said: "we should find a enough to reflect the complexity of the diversity of our world and society.第二部位中文对照翻译部分当代西方建筑美学新思维当代西方建筑美学最显著的特征之一，就是审美思维的变化。